<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsharing is for Morons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battractive.com/blog/2008/10/08/microsharing-is-for-morons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battractive.com/blog/2008/10/08/microsharing-is-for-morons/</link>
	<description>Stand By Your Friends.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 10:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Templeton</title>
		<link>http://battractive.com/blog/2008/10/08/microsharing-is-for-morons/comment-page-1/#comment-16743</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Templeton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battractive.com/blog/2008/10/08/microsharing-is-for-morons/#comment-16743</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not entirely sold on the microsharing term either, mostly because it doesn&#039;t seem to cover the entire spectrum of microblogging activity.

I think the original term sourced by the masses, microblogging, fits perfectly. I defined it as, &quot;A small-scale form of blogging, generally made up of short, succinct messages, used by both consumers and businesses to share news, post status updates and carry on conversations.&quot;

Microsharing seems to fit in as a portion of microblogging, but it&#039;s definitely not a term that can describe the breadth of activity going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not entirely sold on the microsharing term either, mostly because it doesn&#8217;t seem to cover the entire spectrum of microblogging activity.</p>
<p>I think the original term sourced by the masses, microblogging, fits perfectly. I defined it as, &#8220;A small-scale form of blogging, generally made up of short, succinct messages, used by both consumers and businesses to share news, post status updates and carry on conversations.&#8221;</p>
<p>Microsharing seems to fit in as a portion of microblogging, but it&#8217;s definitely not a term that can describe the breadth of activity going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Bergells</title>
		<link>http://battractive.com/blog/2008/10/08/microsharing-is-for-morons/comment-page-1/#comment-16681</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Bergells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battractive.com/blog/2008/10/08/microsharing-is-for-morons/#comment-16681</guid>
		<description>Dennis --

aka @denthewise http://twitter.com/denthewise at Twitter:

I am humbled by your wisdom!

OF COURSE you are RIGHT!

PCP needs to be defined in 140 characters or less!

Your definition is definitely superior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis &#8211;</p>
<p>aka @denthewise <a href="http://twitter.com/denthewise" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/denthewise</a> at Twitter:</p>
<p>I am humbled by your wisdom!</p>
<p>OF COURSE you are RIGHT!</p>
<p>PCP needs to be defined in 140 characters or less!</p>
<p>Your definition is definitely superior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Stevenson</title>
		<link>http://battractive.com/blog/2008/10/08/microsharing-is-for-morons/comment-page-1/#comment-16680</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Stevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battractive.com/blog/2008/10/08/microsharing-is-for-morons/#comment-16680</guid>
		<description>@maniactive

Thanks for this.  You cut, I&#039;ll pick. :)

Was thinking about your definition of PCP.  In the spirit of things, still to wordy - it couldn&#039;t be shared in one go on one of the respective platforms.

PCP: sites that enable 
a) many public &amp; private dialogs &amp; collections; 
b) communications, &amp; relationships; 
c) brevity, the very soul of wit

viz: http://is.gd/3LRB

Dennis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@maniactive</p>
<p>Thanks for this.  You cut, I&#8217;ll pick. <img src='http://battractive.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Was thinking about your definition of PCP.  In the spirit of things, still to wordy &#8211; it couldn&#8217;t be shared in one go on one of the respective platforms.</p>
<p>PCP: sites that enable<br />
a) many public &amp; private dialogs &amp; collections;<br />
b) communications, &amp; relationships;<br />
c) brevity, the very soul of wit</p>
<p>viz: <a href="http://is.gd/3LRB" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/3LRB</a></p>
<p>Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Lou</title>
		<link>http://battractive.com/blog/2008/10/08/microsharing-is-for-morons/comment-page-1/#comment-16678</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battractive.com/blog/2008/10/08/microsharing-is-for-morons/#comment-16678</guid>
		<description>I agree. Micro is inappropriate to use in conjunction with &quot;sharing&quot;, &quot;boobs&quot; and &quot;management.&quot; It is, however, appropriate when applied to the term &quot;brew.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Micro is inappropriate to use in conjunction with &#8220;sharing&#8221;, &#8220;boobs&#8221; and &#8220;management.&#8221; It is, however, appropriate when applied to the term &#8220;brew.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

